Pass the 65

Stage 1 30% of exam

Laws & Regulations

Who must register, who gets a pass, and the ethics rules that fail the most people. The biggest slice of the exam.

Focus on this
Fee = IA. Commission = BD. Find the word, move on.
Focus on this
Excluded = the law never saw you. Exempt = it sees you and waves you through.
Focus on this
Anti-fraud reaches everyone. Exemption from registration is not exemption from fraud.
Focus on this
Fiduciary beats suitable. "It was suitable" is the broker floor, not the adviser ceiling. Pick the higher duty.
Focus on this
Disclose plus informed consent flips a conflict from gotcha to allowed. Hidden is the violation.
Focus on this
Administrator denies, suspends, revokes, and can cease-and-desist without a hearing. Courts jail, the Administrator does not.
Focus on this
Private placement is an exempt TRANSACTION, not an exempt security. The deal is exempt, not the instrument.
Focus on this
Cross $110M and you must go federal. Fall well below $100M and you go back to the state. The buffer does not let you stay forever. Verify figures against current NASAA material.

The 4 roles, and how each one gets paid

You know what a stock is. You can explain a covered call to your barber. None of that helps in the first room, because the Series 65 does not open with markets. It opens with a clipboard. Sixty percent of the people who fail lose it in the rulebook, not the math.

The Uniform Securities Act watches four kinds of people. Two are firms, two are humans. Swap them and you do not miss one question, you miss a cluster.

RoleWhat it doesFirm or humanPaid via
Investment Adviser (IA)Gives advice for payFirmFees
IA Representative (IAR)The human at the IAHumanvia the IA
Broker-Dealer (BD)Transacts. Buys and sells.FirmCommissions
AgentThe human at the BDHumanvia the BD
Common exam trap: fee vs commission.The cleanest line on the whole exam. Advice for a fee is IA world. Transactions for a commission is BD world. When a question buries the word "fee" or "commission" in a wall of text, that word is the answer. The rest is set dressing.

The ABC test

NASAA wants to know if someone is an Investment Adviser. There is a three-part test, and you need all three.

All three, you are an IA. Miss one, you are not. The exam hands you a character missing exactly one prong and asks if they have to register. Find the missing prong.

Common exam trap: compensation does not have to be a check.Bundle the advice fee into a bigger bill and it still counts as compensation. NASAA loves the "but he did not charge separately" head-fake. Do not fall for it.

Excluded vs exempt

This is the line that separates passing from almost passing, and people blow it because the two words feel like the same word. They are not.

Excluded means the law never saw you as an adviser in the first place. You were never in the room. Exempt means the law sees you just fine. It is an adviser. It just waves you through registration anyway.

The classic exclusions: the "LATE" crowd

Professionals whose advice is solely incidental to their real job and who take no special pay for it. Lawyers, Accountants, Teachers, Engineers. Plus banks and broker-dealers. The second one of them starts charging specifically for securities advice and holding out as an adviser, they fall out of the club and become an IA.

Common exam trap: the "solely incidental" tripwire.Accountant telling you which tax lot to sell? Incidental, excluded. Accountant running a billed model portfolio for clients? That is an IA wearing an accountant costume. Same person, opposite answer.

State or federal? The $100M line

An IA registers with the SEC or with the state. Almost never both for the same work. The line is Assets Under Management.

⚠ Verify the exact buffer numbers and the oddball cases (mid-size advisers in states without exam authority, pension consultants) against current NASAA and SEC material before you trust them. Those thresholds get tweaked.

Little advisers go to the states. Big advisers go to the feds. That is the whole shape of it.

Common exam trap: notice filing.A federal covered adviser does not register with the state. But the state can still make it notice file, which is a copy plus a fee, and the state keeps its anti-fraud teeth. "The state has zero power over a federal adviser" is a wrong answer built to feel right.

Fiduciary duty is the whole game

Suitability asks one question: was this an okay thing to recommend? Fiduciary duty asks a harder one: was this the best thing for the client, and did they know everything you knew?

The investment adviser standard is two duties welded together. Duty of loyalty: put the client's interest ahead of your own and disclose every conflict. Duty of care: give advice that is actually in their best interest, on an ongoing basis, with the skill of a professional.

This is a higher bar than the old suitability standard that brokers historically lived under. An adviser cannot just clear "not unreasonable." They have to clear "best interest, fully disclosed." When an answer choice involves the adviser quietly benefiting, it is almost always wrong. The phrase that saves the others: full and fair disclosure of all material conflicts of interest.

Common exam trap: fiduciary is not suitability.If a question pits "suitable" against "best interest," the IA is held to best interest. "It was suitable" is a broker-dealer floor, not an adviser ceiling. Pick the higher duty.

The unethical practices buffet

NASAA keeps a long list of prohibited and unethical business practices. You do not need to recite it. You need to recognize it when it walks past wearing a story. The greatest hits:

Notice a pattern. Most of these are some flavor of putting yourself, your firm, or your commissions ahead of the client. That is the tell.

Common exam trap: borrowing from a client.Borrowing from or lending to a client is prohibited, with a narrow exception: the client is a bank, broker-dealer, or affiliate that is in the business of lending. Your wealthy retail client lending you money? Still a violation.

The magic wrong words

The ethics section has tells. Certain words mark the wrong answer so reliably that you can use them as a filter when you are stuck.

Watch for: guarantee, no risk, can't lose, promise, assured return. An adviser cannot guarantee performance, guarantee against loss, or promise a specific result.

The only "guarantee" that is real in securities is a third party (like an issuer's parent) guaranteeing principal, interest, or dividends on a security itself. An adviser personally guaranteeing your account will not drop? That is a violation, full stop. When you see a client being told they cannot lose, you have usually found the answer.

Common exam trap: "guarantee against loss."An IA or agent offering to cover a client's losses, or guaranteeing no loss, is prohibited. Sounds generous. It is a violation. Generosity is not a defense to a securities rule.

Form ADV, the brochure, and the right to bail

Form ADV has two parts and they point in opposite directions. Part 1 is for the regulators: the dry registration data. Part 2 is the brochure, written in plain English, and it is for clients.

The brochure must be delivered to clients and discloses the adviser's services, fees, conflicts, disciplinary history, and business practices. It must also be delivered, or offered, on an ongoing basis each year.

⚠ verify against current NASAA material for the exact brochure delivery hours and days. There is a delivery-timing rule and a related client right to rescind the contract if the brochure was delivered too late, and those specifics drift over time. Concept: deliver the brochure up front, and a late delivery can give the client a short window to cancel.

Common exam trap: Part 1 vs Part 2.Part 1 ADV is for regulators. Part 2, the brochure, is for clients. If a question asks what the client receives, it is the brochure. Do not hand a client Part 1 and call it disclosure.

Contracts, fees, and custody

At the state level, advisory contracts must be in writing. They must spell out the fee and how it is calculated, the services, and the term.

Two consent rules live here. The contract cannot be assigned to another adviser without the client's consent. And if the adviser is a partnership, clients must get notice of a change in the partnership's membership.

Performance-based fees (a cut of gains) are generally prohibited, with an exception for clients who are sufficiently wealthy or sophisticated, the qualified or accredited tier. ⚠ verify against current NASAA material for the exact net-worth and assets-under-management thresholds.

Then there is custody: holding or controlling client cash or securities. Custody triggers serious obligations: a qualified custodian, a surprise exam by an accountant, and account statements to clients. The sneaky one: automatically deducting your advisory fee from the client's account can itself count as custody.

Common exam trap: fee deduction is custody.Auto-deducting advisory fees from a client account is a form of custody in many cases. Advisers who think they have no custody often do. "I just bill the account" is not a free pass.

Anti-fraud reaches everyone, and consent is the cheat code

Here is the rule that ignores every exemption you learned. The anti-fraud provisions of the Uniform Securities Act apply to everyone. Exempt securities, exempt transactions, federal covered advisers, all of them.

A security being exempt from registration does not make it exempt from fraud rules. Fraud is fraud. The Administrator's anti-fraud authority follows the conduct, not the registration status.

Now the move that flips half the trick questions. Many conflicted actions are not automatically illegal. They become permissible with full disclosure plus informed client consent. Acting as principal in a trade, a conflict of interest, an agency cross: disclose it, get consent before the transaction is completed, and the "gotcha" answer often becomes the allowed one.

So read the fact pattern for two things: did they disclose, and did the client agree. If yes to both, the scary-sounding action may be perfectly fine. If the adviser hid it, it is your answer, and it is a violation.

Common exam trap: disclose-and-consent flips it.Conflicts of interest are usually not banned outright. They are banned when hidden. The exam tests whether you know that disclosure plus informed consent can make a conflicted action legal. Look for both before you condemn it.

State Administrator powers

The Administrator is the state regulator with real teeth. Here is the full enforcement toolkit:

The Administrator's jurisdiction is the state. An Administrator in one state has no direct enforcement power in another, though they cooperate through NASAA.

One line the exam draws hard: the Administrator does not put anyone in prison. Courts do. The Administrator can initiate, refer, and seek penalties, but a conviction and imprisonment happen in a court, not an Administrator's office.

Common exam trap: cease-and-desist and the jailing question.The exam will offer "the Administrator may jail a violator" as an answer. It is wrong. Courts jail people. The Administrator issues C&Ds (without a prior hearing), denies, revokes, and refers to prosecutors, but does not imprison. Also remember: C&Ds do not require a hearing first. If the answer says the Administrator must hold a hearing before issuing a C&D, that is wrong too.

Exempt transactions vs exempt securities

Two categories, two completely different things, and the exam will not remind you which is which.

Exempt securities

The instrument itself is exempt from registration because of what it is:

Exempt transactions

The deal itself is exempt regardless of what the security is. The security could be anything:

Anti-fraud applies to both categories regardless of any exemption. An exempt security sold via fraud is still fraud. An exempt transaction executed via misrepresentation is still a violation.

Common exam trap: private placement is a transaction exemption, not a security exemption.The classic miss: a question mentions a private placement and the wrong answer says it is an "exempt security." A private placement is an exempt transaction. The instrument being sold might be a completely ordinary stock. The exemption is on the deal, not the instrument. If you mix those two up, you miss a cluster of questions.

State vs federal registration edge cases

The $100M line is the headline. The edge cases are what the exam actually tests once you know the headline.

The thresholds (verify all figures)

⚠ Verify every specific dollar figure and client count below against current NASAA and SEC material before you trust them. These thresholds have drifted over time and will drift again.

The $100M to $110M election buffer

If your AUM is in the buffer range, you can elect to register with the SEC or stay with the state. Cross the top of the buffer (over roughly $110M) and you are required to move to the SEC. Drop well below the bottom (back under roughly $90M or $100M depending on the specific rule) and you must go back to the state. The exam tests the direction: cross the top, go federal; fall well below, go back to state.

The de minimis exemption

An adviser with no place of business in a state and only a small number of clients in that state may qualify for an exemption from that state's registration requirement. The concept is that an out-of-state adviser with a handful of in-state clients should not have to register in every state. The exact client count is specified in the rule and should be verified against current NASAA material before the exam.

Common exam trap: the direction of the buffer crossing and mid-size advisers.Two reliable distractors: (1) "An adviser near $100M can just stay wherever they are." Wrong. Cross the top of the buffer and you must go federal; fall well below and you must return to the state. The movement is not optional once you clear the mandatory threshold. (2) "All advisers under $100M must register with the state." The mid-size adviser tier has nuances (state exam requirements, principal-office state rules) that can push someone to the SEC even under $100M. The concept matters more than any single number here. Verify all figures against current NASAA material.

Mnemonics that stick

LATELawyers, Accountants, Teachers, Engineers. The classic exclusions, when advice is solely incidental and there is no special pay.
ABCAdvice, Business, Compensation. All three and you are an IA. Miss one and you are not.
$100MUnder it, state. Over it, SEC. The buffer near the line lets you choose.
LOYAL + CAREFiduciary duty = loyalty (client first, disclose conflicts) plus care (best interest, ongoing, professional skill).
ADV 1 / 2Part 1 is for regulators. Part 2, the brochure, is for clients.
D+CDisclose and Consent. The combination that makes many conflicted actions allowed.
DSCBIDeny, Suspend, Cancel, Bar, Issue (cease-and-desist). The Administrator's enforcement toolkit. Courts do the jailing.
ET vs ESExempt Transaction = the deal is exempt. Exempt Security = the instrument is exempt. Private placement is a transaction exemption, not a security exemption.

One-screen cheat sheet